Quality Notes - Enterprise LLM Adoption Kit
Updated: 2026-05-30
These notes keep the repository easy to review without overstating what is production-ready.
Profile
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | enterprise-llm-adoption-kit |
| Primary stack | Terraform, Docker |
| Review expectation | Local review should not require customer data or production credentials. |
Commands
| Purpose | Command |
|---|---|
| Full local gate | make verify |
CI
- .github/workflows/architecture-blueprint.yml
- .github/workflows/backend-quality-gate.yml
- .github/workflows/ci.yml
- .github/workflows/dependency-review.yml
- .github/workflows/docker-publish.yml
- .github/workflows/pages-auto-deploy.yml
- .github/workflows/production-smoke.yml
- .github/workflows/repository-health.yml
- .github/workflows/repository-surface.yml
- .github/workflows/secret-scan.yml
- .github/workflows/security-scan.yml
Boundaries
- Demo, fixture, and synthetic-data modes must stay clearly labeled.
- Provider keys, tenant credentials, warehouse secrets, medical data, financial data, or customer logs must never be committed.
- Production claims require environment-specific validation, monitoring, rollback, and human approval paths.
- Screenshots, videos, and README claims should match the current implementation and documented commands.
Before Presenting
- README explains the user, the pain, the safety boundary, and the fast path.
docs/service-launch-playbook.mdexplains the product, pilot, service, or proof-of-value angle when relevant.- Tests or smoke checks are documented even when optional infrastructure is unavailable.
- Failure modes and unsupported claims are visible before the project is presented externally.
Checked-in evidence inventory
The following files and commands are discovered from this repository rather than inferred from a generic template. Their presence does not prove production readiness by itself; it gives reviewers a concrete path to reproduce the maintained checks.
Verification commands
make verify
Test files
app/backend/tests/conftest.pyapp/backend/tests/test_alerts_and_audit_support.pyapp/backend/tests/test_architecture_resource_pack.pyapp/backend/tests/test_audit_viewer_hardening.pyapp/backend/tests/test_auth_hardening.pyapp/backend/tests/test_auth_login_code.pyapp/backend/tests/test_bedrock_runtime.pyapp/backend/tests/test_codeql_regressions.pyapp/backend/tests/test_control_tower.pyapp/backend/tests/test_control_tower_service.pyapp/backend/tests/test_databricks_adapter_unit.pyapp/backend/tests/test_databricks_audit_bridge.pyapp/backend/tests/test_event_sanitization_hardening.pyapp/backend/tests/test_fault_injection.pyapp/backend/tests/test_health_endpoint.pyapp/backend/tests/test_http_hardening.pyapp/backend/tests/test_integration_auth_hardening.pyapp/backend/tests/test_llm_fallback_hardening.pyapp/backend/tests/test_llm_stub_adapter.pyapp/backend/tests/test_observability_support.py
Continuous integration workflows
.github/workflows/architecture-blueprint.yml.github/workflows/backend-quality-gate.yml.github/workflows/ci.yml.github/workflows/dependency-review.yml.github/workflows/docker-publish.yml.github/workflows/pages-auto-deploy.yml.github/workflows/production-smoke.yml.github/workflows/repository-health.yml.github/workflows/repository-surface.yml.github/workflows/secret-scan.yml.github/workflows/security-scan.yml
How to interpret the result
A passing local or CI check supports only the behavior covered by that check. It does not establish security certification, regulatory approval, clinical validity, production availability, or a customer outcome. Review the source, fixtures, environment assumptions, and failure paths before extending the result to another deployment.